<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fools Rush In (not the movie) + Bonus:  Learn Why Banks Aren&#8217;t Lending to You</title>
	<link>http://adamjdavis.com/2008/12/16/fools-rush-in-not-the-movie-bonus-learn-why-banks-arent-lending-to-you.html</link>
	<description>Radical Change = Radical Results.  Start Making More Money Now</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Davis</title>
		<link>http://adamjdavis.com/2008/12/16/fools-rush-in-not-the-movie-bonus-learn-why-banks-arent-lending-to-you.html#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamjdavis.com/2008/12/16/fools-rush-in-not-the-movie-bonus-learn-why-banks-arent-lending-to-you.html#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment and appreciate you reading.

I agree, I was a bit liberal with the 'group think' phrasing (although it seems as though they all might as well have been in the same room!).

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment and appreciate you reading.</p>
<p>I agree, I was a bit liberal with the &#8216;group think&#8217; phrasing (although it seems as though they all might as well have been in the same room!).</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Johnsonie</title>
		<link>http://adamjdavis.com/2008/12/16/fools-rush-in-not-the-movie-bonus-learn-why-banks-arent-lending-to-you.html#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Johnsonie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamjdavis.com/2008/12/16/fools-rush-in-not-the-movie-bonus-learn-why-banks-arent-lending-to-you.html#comment-341</guid>
		<description>Another great article as usual. Keep up the good work - I stumbled upon your blog one day and have read nearly everything. 

I probably would have used the phrase "social proof" rather than 'group think," as these were separate entities, not members of the same single group, but I take your basic point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great article as usual. Keep up the good work - I stumbled upon your blog one day and have read nearly everything. </p>
<p>I probably would have used the phrase &#8220;social proof&#8221; rather than &#8216;group think,&#8221; as these were separate entities, not members of the same single group, but I take your basic point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
